Talk Academia

Yes ok, but independently of who leaks. My consideration is that, it is not plausible that Italy and France have no winning applications. This may mean that not all winners have received yet their email? I applied in France, no email yet, but from the secret source here I know that I won't get it. ...

Yes ok, but independently of who leaks. My consideration is that, it is not plausible that Italy and France have no winning applications. This may mean that not all winners have received yet their email? I applied in France, no email yet, but from the secret source here I know that I won't get it. ...

Omg, so absolutely non serious that some NCP know and circulate results in advance and some others don't. Makenno sense to me :shock: Hi everyone, for the record, so single NCP in either France or Italy knows the results, I've been stalking them all since early this morning! :shock: Well I'm wonder...

Cat_Bì wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:46 pm

Hi everyone,

for the record, so single NCP in either France or Italy knows the results, I've been stalking them all since early this morning!

Does this mean that the process is still random?

NeoM2020 wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 08, 2021 2:02 pm

Have all of the Dream Team's successful candidates here been officially notified, or are there still some unofficial winners waiting for the official EC notification?

Exactly, that is the right question to pose in this moment. Any answers from Forum colleagues?

physics_girl wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:17 am

I know someone last year in PHY who didn't hear until 5pm and got the grant with high 90s as their score. So I'm not sure about the theory that they send the emails by score

Thanks for sorting out my speculation.

go to your proposal, click on Actions, then follow up and you will end up in a page where you can see a folded called process documents: there you should find your proposal in pdf and the evaluation letter and so on. I did, but I can't find it, there are only the submitted files. Maybe this process...

This sounds perfect on paper but I personally, over the years, have seen dozens of examples of random, inconsistent and self-contraductory reviewer comments. They will literally say that the project is innovative in the first comment and that the projects lacks innovative aspects in the last one, w...

Dear fellows, some thoughts for a quiet weekend...