Talk Academia

Rejected. From 85.4, to 84.6....... to 61.

..well, I'm so done with academia. Thank you all for your support, and good luck for the rest !

iteration wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 21, 2022 1:50 am

jasermsc wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 21, 2022 1:47 am

Is everyone asleep?

I am in a timezone where I will be sleeping in 12 hours

How lucky! Here it will soon be 2:00 am, I can't afford to stay, but I want to know!!!

Still nothing...

So sorry for you three... It's okay to feel bad, but if you feel you made something wrong, please try to remember that this letter doesn't mean your project is not good, like we said again and again. You were just unlucky in a grant that requires prodigious amounts of luck. (well, I know that I will...

I'm sorry to hear that Taha2021... Maybe they are sending rejection letters first due to last year complaints? I'm still in Evaluation, so much likely rejected, but nothing yet. So they'd only send rejection letters to >70%? edit: I am sorry for all who have received the dreaded rejection letter. H...

This is minor reduction and reviewers do not need to give any justifications. Which section score reduced? Excellence 4.3 to 4.0 Impact 4.9 to 4.8 On the other hand, I grabed some points in Implementation. Thank you so much for your input, I'm so glad I answered your question :mrgreen:

Which section score reduced? That's odd that you've got a lower score the second time. Theoretically, if you stated that you are resubmitting, if you get a lower score than the previous year the evaluators have to to justify this and say why it was worse than the previous application. This prompted...

It is difficult to know what the evaluators will pick up on. If they like the idea, they often ignore small issues with the project proposal. If they don't like the idea, they will list all sort of problems to reduce the mark. I had an application submitted twice: first it got 82.5 second time 80.2...

That's odd that you've got a lower score the second time. Theoretically, if you stated that you are resubmitting, if you get a lower score than the previous year the evaluators have to to justify this and say why it was worse than the previous application. This prompted me to check my scores: - 1st...

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acron...