Talk Academia

So, for those rejected folks, will your potential host still want to hire you in the following future? Not for me - it was a top-level international host that has a huge demand from researchers to have an affiliation. Mine is a top UK uni/one of the best in the world and crazy competitive, so out o...

So, for those rejected folks, will your potential host still want to hire you in the following future?

I guess this means they didn't like the project. Totally subjective... which shouldn't be. Do they give examples of why blah blah is not sufficient? examples state of the art is not sufficiently detailed, and relevant aspects connected to the project have been insufficiently outlined. two insuffici...

Is this your first attempt? yes, what I can observe from the report is they keep saying blablabla is not sufficient enough. I guess this means they didn't like the project. Totally subjective... which shouldn't be. Do they give examples of why blah blah is not sufficient? examples state of the art ...

Is this your first attempt? yes, what I can observe from the report is they keep saying blablabla is not sufficient enough. Which panel? Any strengths? CHE In the proposal, I use 11 front size, and in first part, it already reach the page limit, how can I describe everything in much more detail?

What I can say is it is so subjective and completely lottery. Their comments are completely bullshit. They even judge my scientific knowledge, fuck me. WTF with the reviewer and give me such a low score. Is this your first attempt? yes, what I can observe from the report is they keep saying blablab...

What I can say is it is so subjective and completely lottery. Their comments are completely bullshit. They even judge my scientific knowledge, fuck me. WTF with the reviewer and give me such a low score. And I wanted to ask you. Sorry to hear that. Is it the excellence part that brought your score ...

What I can say is it is so subjective and completely lottery.
Their comments are completely bullshit.
They even judge my scientific knowledge, fuck me.

WTF with the reviewer and give me such a low score.

Cukovic was corrected, rejected, below threshold.