Talk Academia

I just have a question. Do reviewers evaluate excellence (or any other part) by only considering its section? or do they consider the whole package and then check excellence, impact, and implementation? For example, I have some implementation discussions in the first part. You need to check the eva...

I guess because usually nothing happen during weekend. Let see what happen on Monday or Tuesday next week. The next thing would be email..... This is my third time for MSCA application. According to my experience of 2020 and 2021, I was always very anxious in the two weeks before the release date. ...

I really hope that the results will be inversely proportional to the stupidities you are writing in this forum about the switching the phase. Once the evaluation is done, a score is assigned and it is inserted in an electronic ranking system. Once all the scores are collected, a computer will autom...

From Countz's message at 2018, where people got ranked in different days (they were in evaluation in early time like this year). However later 2019-2020-2021 there was a change from submission to evaluation to ranking (and the ones had two phage changes in minutes got the fellowship). So this year ...

Guys, I'm quite sure that the evaluation process works like paper reviews. The evaluators are asked to review a project. When they accept, the status changes to "Evaluation". They have a deadline. Depending on how fast they are, they upload a score/comment by this deadline. When all scores are avai...

And this year, the first people to get ranked were on the 31st of January. I got ranked two days later, so it must be a low score.

To me, it is intuitive from last year's spreadsheet that none of the applicants with evaluation to ranking changed on 2nd March or afternoon of 1st March was granted. To be honest, the correlation between the evaluation/ranking changing time and the winning chance is also clear in general. The two ...

Guys, I don't want to be a spoiler but don't expect much logic from this evaluation. In my first application I wan't too good but I got a seal of excellence (86,5). I though with an improved project, better hosts and lots of help from my supervisor if not better I would score at least the same. Wel...

Guys, I don't want to be a spoiler but don't expect much logic from this evaluation. In my first application I wan't too good but I got a seal of excellence (86,5). I though with an improved project, better hosts and lots of help from my supervisor if not better I would score at least the same. Wel...

I am afraid I do not understand this call. I am still in EVALUATION in the CHE panel, and I find it hard to believe that the proposal did not surpass 70%. I guess it is still possible, but I reckon it is unlikely. Last year I had 90% in a worse project. What is tricky about this year, at least in t...