Talk Academia

My status changed to "evaluation" on January 19 2018, i received rejection letter on January 29, noon. Last year i didn't submit. I am not sure, but was thinking that ranking status changes only for the "seal of exelence". Again, i am not sure. It changes for everyone. This year the outofdate link ...

According to the portal, the results will be out on February 11. Hopefully we can avoid the level of madness of last year! It seems that this year they are in advance with the evaluation/report/consensus process. So I think we could expect the results by the end of January. How do you know this? Ke...

mrie wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 17, 2019 10:02 am

According to the portal, the results will be out on February 11. Hopefully we can avoid the level of madness of last year!

It seems that this year they are in advance with the evaluation/report/consensus process. So I think we could expect the results by the end of January.

Hi everyone, I have few doubt. In case that in evaluation researcher earn just 70% or less.Did it application will be rejected before February? And how we know currently status of evaluation process? It is possible to follow it? Thanks!😀😀😀 Hi Dreamer, Regarding your first question, outcome of appli...

Hi again everyone We are writing a complaint to the Commission about unfair evaluation processes, but we need your help. If you think that the evaluation is unfair, please tell us why. Maybe you got a much lower score on re-submission. Maybe you don't think your proposal should have received the hi...

Hi again everyone We are writing a complaint to the Commission about unfair evaluation processes, but we need your help. If you think that the evaluation is unfair, please tell us why. Maybe you got a much lower score on re-submission. Maybe you don't think your proposal should have received the hi...

Is it me or are the reserve lists especially long this year? 114 in SOC was mentioned here! Is that normal, and if not, does anyone know why this is? Not to alarm anybody, but in the acceptance letter there was a separate paragraph explicitly addressing hard Brexit and how it may make the grants no...

I understand the problems, and the aim of reaching out to the Commission, but I'm trying to assess the most impactful way of doing this. Count me in, I was indeed thinking something similar, maybe a letter to an editor. We should highlight the weaknesses of their system. I would be happy to co-auth...

Get the reviewers to do their job or hire better reviewers. Justify deducted points substantively. Reach consensus before combining individual scores, don't just pile individual comments together. Consider previous years evaluations in resubmission cases. Have an open mind, think outside disciplina...

Didn't get it - 82% - down from 93% preciously. If that's not crazy in itself - the report contradicts itself, AND one of the sections only scored 4.5 but has no weaknesses listed to explain the missing 0.5 points. Another great job done by the European Commission. :roll: :shock: :shock: :o :o