Talk Academia

I also have the same challenge of 'squeezing' my entire proposal withing10 pages. It is really not easy; yes, I had to use Arial narrow for B1! This year is very challenging to fit into 10 pages, due to the new sections. Is anyone planning to use Arial narrow font in B1 part? In the instruction they...

iteration wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 12, 2021 2:31 pm

Not how it works.
Comments are shown to reviewers only AFTER they have made a decision, and if the score is lower than the previous submission.
Previous scores do not influence reviewers.

Oh, thank you for the clarification! Showing them AFTER they have made their decision makes sense.

Hello!! I am also re-applying this year. A quetsion. Do we have to say that this is a re-submission or not? (is it obligatory?) I was also considering this question. Well, I don't think the declaration is compulsory but expected; so, it is advised you state it. What happens if the Commission finds ...

Hello!! I am also re-applying this year. A quetsion. Do we have to say that this is a re-submission or not? (is it obligatory?) I just found this, "Proposals are only considered as re-submissions if the Supervisor, Researcher and Host Organisation are the same as in the previously submitted proposa...

Pikatsu wrote: ↑

Thu Aug 12, 2021 9:21 am

I have a silly question. In the template up at the right corner there is a header "EU Grants: Application form (HE MSCA PF): V1.0 – 18.06.2021"
We can delete this, correct?

I didn't delete mine but reduced the header/footer margin.
By the way, your question isn't silly!

I was expecting the forum to be more active than this!
Are you guys that busy with your proposal or just 'hibernating' '?

Hello!! I am also re-applying this year. A quetsion. Do we have to say that this is a re-submission or not? (is it obligatory?) I was also considering this question. Well, I don't think the declaration is compulsory but expected; so, it is advised you state it. What happens if the Commission finds ...

Hi everyone, good to be here! I'm planning to resubmit my application but will appreciate if anyone could assist me here, especially with the implementation section. The two weaknesses pointed out by reviewers are: 1 The workplan does not meet the requirements of the project undermining its effectiv...