ID 7862XX and recieved the rejection letter at 0:52
2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:12 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Please also check on your Participant Portal in the Follow-up section. Maybe the results could be there already even though you have not received any email yet...fun4sci wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:17 amI am between those ID numbers and still not received the ESR. Also, from panel IF-EF-SE that someone has already received the results.zhiqiang wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:59 amI am pretty sure that they follow the ID. Mine is 7975** and still nothing.Ornella123 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:58 amI'm not sure they follow the ID though... I've seen a message from someone who got the results with 799xxx, I have 797xxx and still nothing
I wonder what is the criterion for the order. Anyway,I hope to receive the results soon.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Sorry to hear that. I had a similar drop from year 1 (92.4) to year 2 (82.2). I was on reserve list on year 1, and this year (year 3), I'm again on reserve list with 93.0... This is just to say that you might get it next year with the same proposal (the only thing that I had really up-dated is the CV).laprofesora wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:07 amBloody hell, this is so discouraging. I am really sorry Arale...
Best
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:12 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
By the way are you guys (Girls included ) are satisfied with the quality of comments? I mean I don't mind I got rejection but I should have got something which may help to improve my proposal on scientific bases. I mean seriously? there is no comment on my proposed idea..I was expecting some useful input to strengthen my proposal for another venue.
Last edited by InfoCom on Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
InfoCom wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:30 amBy the way are you guys (Girls included ) are satisfied with the quality of comments? I mean I don't mind I got rejection but I should have got something which may help to improve my proposal on scientific bases. I mean seriously? there is no comment on my proposed idea..I was expecting some useful input to strengthen my proposal for another venue.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:27 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Hey BB8, what was your panel?
I am ST-LIF and I have 92.8, and I'm on the waiting list.
I wonder how many people are on that list before me...
Big congrats to all who were successful!!
I am ST-LIF and I have 92.8, and I'm on the waiting list.
I wonder how many people are on that list before me...
Big congrats to all who were successful!!
BB8 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:20 amSorry to hear that. I had a similar drop from year 1 (92.4) to year 2 (82.2). I was on reserve list on year 1, and this year (year 3), I'm again on reserve list with 93.0... This is just to say that you might get it next year with the same proposal (the only thing that I had really up-dated is the CV).laprofesora wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:07 amBloody hell, this is so discouraging. I am really sorry Arale...
Best
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:14 pm
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Anyone in the reserve list in IF ENG?
I'm on the reserve list with 91.5, which I take as a rejection, as those in the reserve list lucky enough to get through are contacted at a very late stage and Marie Curie forces you to stay the 24 months or to return all the money, and I don't plan to be a postdoc 3 years from now.
I'm on the reserve list with 91.5, which I take as a rejection, as those in the reserve list lucky enough to get through are contacted at a very late stage and Marie Curie forces you to stay the 24 months or to return all the money, and I don't plan to be a postdoc 3 years from now.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Second rejection this year. GF-SOC 83%. Reviews were of much higher quality this year, and written in such a way that it is clear how to address them - last year I got a couple of general comments like "insufficient detail"/"insufficient information" that are not helpful for improving a proposal. However I am sure the reviewers will find new weaknesses next year. I am still very disappointed but nothing can be changed now!