no way you have that kind of information. the ncps do not have the reports.
2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Last edited by Kenniz on Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:58 pm
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:55 pm
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Every year we fall in this kind of jokes.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Yeah, this is 100% a troll. There is no way people are sending out spreadsheets of all scoresAnnaMC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:52 amGDPR alert...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_D ... Regulation
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:24 pm
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
If the EC assessed that you have addressed the ethics well enough then you shouldn't worry. Anyway, with such an important ethical section, if your project gets funded you could sit in front of an ethics committee at your host institution ...
FestivusShadow wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:54 amHi guys,
I am in RANKING but I have not been contacted by the ethical team . I have a project that deals with animals so ethical section is kinda important.
Does this mean game over for me?
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
If you look up last year's thread, there was also a guy who had gotten a partial list of project IDs and scores. A few people contacted him, and confirmed that he had given the correct score after the official results came out. So, I agree that this should not happen, but at least the guy from last year seemed legit. If I remember correctly, his NPC was also from Spain... maybe it's time for a GDPR training for that NPCPetetheCat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:57 amYeah, this is 100% a troll. There is no way people are sending out spreadsheets of all scoresAnnaMC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:52 amGDPR alert...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_D ... Regulation
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:55 pm
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Man, you have been constantly writing about this. At some point this starts to be annoying. I understand you are in what seems a bad situation (I am also still in evaluation) but no one here can tell you the truth on what is happening. It is all speculation but keep in mind that it is highly probable you are under 70% (like me).waqar.ameer wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:51 amWere you on Evaluation/Ranking Status with 3.9/4.7/4.1
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Just a random kitty pic to relax a bit (best animals ever)
- Attachments
-
- EFlbPeRU8AEbJRS.jpg (247.55 KiB) Viewed 8471 times
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Who knows what it means! But if you read the ethics guidelines they only contact people when there are questions after the ethics review. The proposal is not evaluated for funding on the basis of the ethics review, but they make sure you are going to do a project without ethical problems. Most likely because your work deals with animals you were very careful about this section. Do don’t worry.FestivusShadow wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:54 amHi guys,
I am in RANKING but I have not been contacted by the ethical team . I have a project that deals with animals so ethical section is kinda important.
Does this mean game over for me?
Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
It depends. All the proposals that are likely to be funded will go through an ethics assessment by the MSCA ethics team. If you have addressed all the ethical issues and left nothing unclear about them in your proposal then there is no reason for them to contact you.FestivusShadow wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:54 amHi guys,
I am in RANKING but I have not been contacted by the ethical team . I have a project that deals with animals so ethical section is kinda important.
Does this mean game over for me?