Page 135 of 149
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:54 pm
by IF ST LIF
pinedamarcelo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:53 pm
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:52 pm
Reserve list here, 92.6 ST LIF. What a pain... so close I guess!
hey, how do you check you mark?
It was a short window of time during this morning that FO button was working...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:58 pm
by pinedamarcelo
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:54 pm
pinedamarcelo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:53 pm
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:52 pm
Reserve list here, 92.6 ST LIF. What a pain... so close I guess!
hey, how do you check you mark?
It was a short window of time during this morning that FO button was working...
hahaha cool! I was absolutely crazy trying to find it. So, let´s the system breath a bit ...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:13 pm
by fun4sci
Regarding the comments received from the reviewers, don't worry at all.
In my experience, they first decide if the project is to be funded and after that they score it. I do not say that it is always that way. But for me it is very relevant that this time, in which I prepare the proposal with few time since it was a 'last minute' decision, it has been positively evaluated. And I'm sure that are some residual parts (dissemination, training) that are not as well described as it should be. However, the project (and impact) as a whole is very strong and I think the evaluators have taken this into account.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:17 pm
by Scattman
GOT the Grant agreement notification,WOW!
but I don't the score yet, the EU server is collapsed.
I'm in PHYS panel, 800XXX, and went to RANKING on the 24th.
Congratulation to all the others who got it and to the others:"don't give up". Last year I went into the reserve list and this year I applied with a completely different project and different host. However, last year experience and the reviewers' comments were essential to write a good project this time. Go back on the evaluation letter during the next proposal writing and you'll get something useful out of them.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:18 pm
by klain
Does anyone has a link with the thresholds of the different panels?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:20 pm
by pinedamarcelo
Does anyone the maximum time it is possible to postpone the starting?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:24 pm
by Rapaz
Rapaz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:33 pm
aberfeldy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:04 pm
Rapaz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:22 pm
Got the love letter from Marie Curie and won the lottery!!!!!
798XXX, changed to Ranking on 24th.
ST-EF-LIF. No access to my report- the webpage is collapsed
Rapaz Congrats!!!
))
Thanks.
As I can´t see the score (servers collapsed), It´s so hard to believe. But the Proposal is already in Projects section and the emails are clear.
Now, does anyone know if the Grant Agreement is very complicated and time consuming?
96%
4.8/5/4.5
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:26 pm
by Reserve
klain wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:18 pm
Does anyone has a link with the thresholds of the different panels?
https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... -2017.html#
In the section of Topic conditions and documents, at the end of the section you can find a pdf with the percentile table.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:33 pm
by SOCEF-msca
I got it! 91.4 SOC Standard
Second time. First with a different host and proposal: 98.2
Looks like cut threshold this year was a bit lower
I went ranked on 24th
id 795xxx
Learning: having got a great feedback the first time has been crucial. Then, try to follow the feedback and share draft with as many people as possible before submitting
Good luck for all
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 4:41 pm
by FuriousAcademic
Interesting, thank you. And I guess that there is no way of knowing the exact threshold?