2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
hi folks.
mine is still in evaluation phase.
does anybody know how long it takes to go from evaluation to ranking and then finally outcome?
maybe no hopes for this Monday.
mine is still in evaluation phase.
does anybody know how long it takes to go from evaluation to ranking and then finally outcome?
maybe no hopes for this Monday.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Did anyone hear from their NCP? Normally they get the threshold and the number of funded app details weeks or days before the results was what i recollect?
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Hmmm cant ignore the misogyny in that post
[
quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110]
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
[
quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110]
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
[/quote]
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Well, semantically it is not misoginy but rather androphilia
In any case, I was referring to the fact that Bren said that to be a straight white men in social science apparently is a problem. And he urged me not to be hormonal (after writing that I have a cognitive retardation). But I see that the word testosteronic attracts much attention
In any case, I was referring to the fact that Bren said that to be a straight white men in social science apparently is a problem. And he urged me not to be hormonal (after writing that I have a cognitive retardation). But I see that the word testosteronic attracts much attention
[/quote]sound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:23 pmHmmm cant ignore the misogyny in that post
[
quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110]
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Hey you little weed, I was trying to be nice and then you rake up the past like an old lady on her deathbed. Shocking.
[/quote]danGFSOC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:38 pmWell, semantically it is not misoginy but rather androphilia
In any case, I was referring to the fact that Bren said that to be a straight white men in social science apparently is a problem. And he urged me not to be hormonal (after writing that I have a cognitive retardation). But I see that the word testosteronic attracts much attention
sound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:23 pmHmmm cant ignore the misogyny in that post
[
quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110]
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Thanks, Bren. I appreciated the effort (I am not sarcastic). Now, I am going to change my nickname into "oldladyGFSOC"
[/quote]Bren wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:52 pmHey you little weed, I was trying to be nice and then you rake up the past like an old lady on her deathbed. Shocking.
danGFSOC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:38 pmWell, semantically it is not misoginy but rather androphilia
In any case, I was referring to the fact that Bren said that to be a straight white men in social science apparently is a problem. And he urged me not to be hormonal (after writing that I have a cognitive retardation). But I see that the word testosteronic attracts much attention
sound wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:23 pmHmmm cant ignore the misogyny in that post
[
quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110]
Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants
By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number of applications per action from 2017 to 2018 (considering that this year the average funding per project will be slightly higher because of the increase of the living allowance).
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
I'm glad we are ok now. Secretly, I think you are rather attracted to my 'testosteronic' attitude
[/quote]danGFSOC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:19 pmThanks, Bren. I appreciated the effort (I am not sarcastic). Now, I am going to change my nickname into "oldladyGFSOC"
Bren wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:52 pmHey you little weed, I was trying to be nice and then you rake up the past like an old lady on her deathbed. Shocking.
danGFSOC wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 6:38 pmWell, semantically it is not misoginy but rather androphilia
In any case, I was referring to the fact that Bren said that to be a straight white men in social science apparently is a problem. And he urged me not to be hormonal (after writing that I have a cognitive retardation). But I see that the word testosteronic attracts much attention
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Thats some back story there
[/quote]