2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

[dreamline]

Very unlikely.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?

[ATBGF2017]

I think they don't.

Very unlikely.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?

[Bren]

That link was created by a maladjusted computer nerd who works for the commission, and who, every year, takes great pleasure from tormenting us. In other words, the link is horseshit, ignore the damn thing.

Very unlikely.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?

[hmdoel]

Basically, once you passed 70% you are eligible for the grant. However, since the budget is limited, the proposals above 70% are ranked to decide the cut-off score for funding.

So yes, those proposals below 70% will not be ranked.

Very unlikely.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?

[evolved]

Guys its very simple
have a look page 26 here:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participan ... -20_en.pdf

Ranking relates to the ranking list.

[Flocci]

I repeat, judging from my experience and at least 2 people I know in person, for 2017 MC those that remain evaluation until the last day, will not pass the threshold. Things may change, of course, for this uear.

uote=dreamline post_id=3484 time=1548783000 user_id=340]

Very unlikely.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?
[/quote]

[dreamline]

Basically, once you passed 70% you are eligible for the grant. However, since the budget is limited, the proposals above 70% are ranked to decide the cut-off score for funding.

So yes, those proposals below 70% will not be ranked.

Very unlikely.

Does anybody know if the proposals are either illegible or didn't pass 70% will enter into the 'RANKING' procedure? and what is the purpose of 'RANKING'?

otherwise, RANKING unnecessay proposals does not make much sense

[cukovic]

As I said before, people in <70% are also a rarity. Few proposals reach <70%

That is also a possibility.

Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?

I disagree with this. Take a look on the percentage of proposals below threshold for 2017:
https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... 017_en.pdf

[evolved]

You just proved my point. Look at ST_LIF for example.
13.52%

incredibly, lower than even the success rate

As I said before, people in <70% are also a rarity. Few proposals reach <70%

That is also a possibility.

I disagree with this. Take a look on the percentage of proposals below threshold for 2017:
https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... 017_en.pdf

[hmdoel]

yeah, I think in average around 20% of the proposal below the threshold

As I said before, people in <70% are also a rarity. Few proposals reach <70%

That is also a possibility.

I disagree with this. Take a look on the percentage of proposals below threshold for 2017:
https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... 017_en.pdf