2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Where is SOC-2018 to check it?
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
a few days ago we were sharing our first digits of the ID numbers and the lowest was 831XXX, so this is why.
MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:47 amWhy do we assume that 831xxx are the first id?
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
I have got it from a research office and the source is a national contact point in North Europe (which is not willing to disclose results). However I do not know if to believe it. The answer is phrased more or less in a way the Norwegian NCP did on Twitter last week (and it was clearly not true). I guess that they are phrasing their answer this way just to make it believe that some people are getting their response officially, while the truth is very much different (people that know their result are getting it from leakages all around Europe). But maybe they will push the button for sending official emails today. I hope so. This situation is not sustainable...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
mrie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:14 amhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participan ... ct/xxxxxxx with xxxxxxx your project id
Probably doesn't mean anything though
i am ranking...fingers crossed
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
MSCA should definitely check their regulations and NCPs...danGFSOC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:54 amI have got it from a research office and the source is a national contact point in North Europe (which is not willing to disclose results). However I do not know if to believe it. The answer is phrased more or less in a way the Norwegian NCP did on Twitter last week (and it was clearly not true). I guess that they are phrasing their answer this way just to make it believe that some people are getting their response officially, while the truth is very much different (people that know their result are getting it from leakages all around Europe). But maybe they will push the button for sending official emails today. I hope so. This situation is not sustainable...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
I think the biggest scandal from this whole mess is the fact that a forum member was provided with a list of results by an NCP and was able to give out results upon request. That is one big fat mess, and it bothers me to know that it will be lost amidst the chaos of the past few weeks and no one will be held accountable.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
dansk også? I would not be surprised if they did as you suggest to sort of cover up the epic fail. :/ After all I appreciate that they stick to confidentiality.danGFSOC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:54 amI have got it from a research office and the source is a national contact point in North Europe (which is not willing to disclose results). However I do not know if to believe it. The answer is phrased more or less in a way the Norwegian NCP did on Twitter last week (and it was clearly not true). I guess that they are phrasing their answer this way just to make it believe that some people are getting their response officially, while the truth is very much different (people that know their result are getting it from leakages all around Europe). But maybe they will push the button for sending official emails today. I hope so. This situation is not sustainable...
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:40 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Wait, what? Apparently I haven't been lurking deep enough to have missed this. If this is true, I think it is quite a big issue as that information is obviously confidential. I don't feel comfortable with some random forum member having my results and being able to give them out to anyone upon request. That's just not right.Bren wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:03 pmI think the biggest scandal from this whole mess is the fact that a forum member was provided with a list of results by an NCP and was able to give out results upon request. That is one big fat mess, and it bothers me to know that it will be lost amidst the chaos of the past few weeks and no one will be held accountable.