2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
844XXX ENG PANEL
98%
to be honest, I am really surprised (pleasantly)
Good luck everyone who still waiting
98%
to be honest, I am really surprised (pleasantly)
Good luck everyone who still waiting
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
I've been reading all the comments here since Friday. I feel I'm the only one here that is from Nigeria. Rejected anyway... Congratulations to those that got it.... 841***, Panel: ENV
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
This reviewers should be identified and prevented from ever doing such shitty job.Dajm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:52 amWow, that beats mine . I said I speak the languages of the case countries (highlighted as a strength last year) and the reviewers felt like I should have elaborated on how well
PetetheCat wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:49 amAnd when I say spurious, I mean that one of the negative comments was *literally* that I didn't explain clearly enough how the host would provide office space. If that's how they are rejecting them, that's fine - I have a life to get on with!PetetheCat wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:45 am88.6, CAR, supposedly on the reserve list. I have gainful employment outside of academia, this was a weird moment where I thought maybe I would come back, but I'm also surprisingly okay with not doing so. I think it helps that the negative comments from the reviewers are really stupid - they just don't actually feel like criticisms because they are so spurious.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:11 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Got it. Panel chem score 96.2, 842XXX.
Last year was a reserve list
Last year was a reserve list
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Congrats,
Did you just receive the mail even though 842?
Did you just receive the mail even though 842?
academic_guru wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:02 amGot it. Panel chem score 96.2, 842XXX.
Last year was a reserve list
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 3:48 pm
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:11 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Yes, I got emails.MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:04 amCongrats,
Did you just receive the mail even though 842?academic_guru wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:02 amGot it. Panel chem score 96.4, 842XXX.
Last year was a reserve list
Few points:
1. I didn't talk about gender
2. I used tables and charts in the core of the proposal.
So don't believe what someone says.
The proposal has to be scientifically strong, with the CV of applicant and host. Apply with big host and make your proposal attractive and pay equal attention to each section.
Last edited by academic_guru on Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:14 am
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
guess they send the rejections at the end...so I have a feeling I am rejected...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
It seems so
845xxx they might have forgotten this batch
845xxx they might have forgotten this batch
sam-phy-if wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:10 amguess they send the rejections at the end...so I have a feeling I am rejected...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Hi,
842XXX (email at 6 am)
I got rejection (86) in chem panel.
They somehow told me that PI is not top, and they do not like risky project (but how can I bring, working in science, novelty or "know-how" without risky?).
They put many strengthens and few weaknesses.
Funny one (how can I bring deliverables in the beginning or middle of WP? I am not from Hogwarts)
- Most of the deliverables and milestones in the Gantt chart are scheduled at the end of the corresponding work packages which will make it
difficult to timely detect problems and will add complexity to the progress of the project.
Very happy who got it, and sorry who not.
Stay positive.
Cheers.
842XXX (email at 6 am)
I got rejection (86) in chem panel.
They somehow told me that PI is not top, and they do not like risky project (but how can I bring, working in science, novelty or "know-how" without risky?).
They put many strengthens and few weaknesses.
Funny one (how can I bring deliverables in the beginning or middle of WP? I am not from Hogwarts)
- Most of the deliverables and milestones in the Gantt chart are scheduled at the end of the corresponding work packages which will make it
difficult to timely detect problems and will add complexity to the progress of the project.
Very happy who got it, and sorry who not.
Stay positive.
Cheers.