2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

[AnnaMC]

no research on it, no practice on it!

As blue as viagra for me as well!

assuming anna is female and you are a young scientist you should not come into contact with that stuff except you are doing research on it

[MSCA_CHEM_2019]

has someone else the golden colour?

[AnnaMC]

I really can't believe that we are (somewhat, almost, maybe) post-docs and we are checking template colours to tell us the future

[MSCA_CHEM_2019]

I really can't believe that we are (somewhat, almost, maybe) post-docs and we are checking template colours to tell us the future

[AdinaBabesh]

Oh, well, even post-docs are human beings ...

[Kenniz]

has someone else the golden colour?

no i dont think so. maybe it has something to do with other applications etc. i think it means nothing, as everybody i could find in the past had blue coloring

[MSCA_CHEM_2019]

has someone else the golden colour?

no i dont think so. maybe it has something to do with other applications etc. i think it means nothing, as everybody i could find in the past had blue coloring

Ok..Thank you!!

[Kenniz]

BTW what is your poropsal id-range?
mine is 88xxxx

[MSCA_CHEM_2019]

BTW what is your poropsal id-range?
mine is 88xxxx

The same for me

[megasphaera]

They wrote "The publication record of the researcher is limited for their level of expertise"

Don't pay attention to the comment you received. The number of publications has no impact. However, there are always reviewers that are stupid and have not read the manual for evaluators.
Getting this fellowship is pure luck (whether or not you get reviewers that like your project and thinks is an excellent one).

no you said the reviewer was stupid because he did not read the guidelines (i.e. the guidelines you proposed that state publications should not be included), meaning that the reviewer was stupid because he took the publication amount into account, according to you.
maybe you should relax?

My fault I did not know about the statement they can penalise if you think it's not enough giving researcher career. But Let me ask you: is there any official number of paper you should have after your PhD or a postdoc?
Msca does not give specific guidelines on that. So I think is still stupid to leave the comment "researcher has not enough paper according to its career" .

As I told you, I know people with the same exact commentary and they still got a high score in excellence and got the fellowship. And people with nature paper that did not get it. So I still think publication has no impact on outcome because there is no consensus on the number of paper you should have after a PhD or postdoc.
I also think that in 2020 we should try to move away from the publication number thing. These are the stuff that make academia toxic