Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:31 pm
yes status updates came well before final results but I am sure we were in evaluation by now
This also happened to me. And both myself and my supervisor thought at first that it was a rejection for this year. He sent an email saying that he was shocked and copying in the department research manager asking if we could find new avenues to try and get my project funded. And then realizing that there was no evaluation in the portal and that the application for this year still said that it was pending, I figured it out. What a horrible 30 minutes of rejected feelings. My proposal was reviewed very well last year and we worked really hard to tighten it up this year, so it was a shocking feeling that it would do worse than before.
Hopefully you will get it and I wish you good luck. However, just to let you know, there are plenty of people that submitted a better version and answered reviewers comment and got a much lower score.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:14 pmThis also happened to me. And both myself and my supervisor thought at first that it was a rejection for this year. He sent an email saying that he was shocked and copying in the department research manager asking if we could find new avenues to try and get my project funded. And then realizing that there was no evaluation in the portal and that the application for this year still said that it was pending, I figured it out. What a horrible 30 minutes of rejected feelings. My proposal was reviewed very well last year and we worked really hard to tighten it up this year, so it was a shocking feeling that it would do worse than before.
megasphaera wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:25 pmHopefully you will get it and I wish you good luck. However, just to let you know, there are plenty of people that submitted a better version and answered reviewers comment and got a much lower score.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:14 pmThis also happened to me. And both myself and my supervisor thought at first that it was a rejection for this year. He sent an email saying that he was shocked and copying in the department research manager asking if we could find new avenues to try and get my project funded. And then realizing that there was no evaluation in the portal and that the application for this year still said that it was pending, I figured it out. What a horrible 30 minutes of rejected feelings. My proposal was reviewed very well last year and we worked really hard to tighten it up this year, so it was a shocking feeling that it would do worse than before.
That's crazy man. And then when I say that some reviewers are stupid, people get pissed off!!!Simbi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:28 pmUnfortunately true, it happened to me. Applied twice, first time got 91, fixed the proposal following the comments and i got a 76 ...I am curious this year!
megasphaera wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:25 pmHopefully you will get it and I wish you good luck. However, just to let you know, there are plenty of people that submitted a better version and answered reviewers comment and got a much lower score.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:14 pm
This also happened to me. And both myself and my supervisor thought at first that it was a rejection for this year. He sent an email saying that he was shocked and copying in the department research manager asking if we could find new avenues to try and get my project funded. And then realizing that there was no evaluation in the portal and that the application for this year still said that it was pending, I figured it out. What a horrible 30 minutes of rejected feelings. My proposal was reviewed very well last year and we worked really hard to tighten it up this year, so it was a shocking feeling that it would do worse than before.
i am too bored to quote you. but noone got pissed off. you said: reviewers are stupid for not looking in to the guidelines and judging the number of publications. we proofed you were wrong because it is in the guidelines and then you said you would have never said such things. so please dont talk nonsense here and blame other people for your missinformation spreading,, thanksmegasphaera wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:30 pmThat's crazy man. And then when I say that some reviewers are stupid, people get pissed off!!!Simbi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:28 pmUnfortunately true, it happened to me. Applied twice, first time got 91, fixed the proposal following the comments and i got a 76 ...I am curious this year!
megasphaera wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:25 pm
Hopefully you will get it and I wish you good luck. However, just to let you know, there are plenty of people that submitted a better version and answered reviewers comment and got a much lower score.
I cannot understand how a proposal which scored so high on the next year get such a low score. This confirms that this is just a fucking lottery
I was only joking....Kenniz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:49 pmi am too bored to quote you. but noone got pissed off. you said: reviewers are stupid for not looking in to the guidelines and judging the number of publications. we proofed you were wrong because it is in the guidelines and then you said you would have never said such things. so please dont talk nonsense here and blame other people for your missinformation spreading,, thanksmegasphaera wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:30 pmThat's crazy man. And then when I say that some reviewers are stupid, people get pissed off!!!
I cannot understand how a proposal which scored so high on the next year get such a low score. This confirms that this is just a fucking lottery