Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:36 am
SPIN2019 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:23 pmIn my case it show following info:
Call: H2020-MSCA-IF-2019
Type of Action: MSCA-IF-EF-ST
Acronym: XXXXXXXXX
Current Phase: Ranking
Number: 896xxx
Duration: 24 months
GA based on the: -
Start Date:
Estimated Project Cost: €XXXX
Requested EU Contribution: €XXXX
I am curious, if anybody have extra info.
I am agree with you!!! Some people (not all) commented about the evaluation like if they had already got the fellowship and they are only in Ranking.megasphaera wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:01 am
My two cents on this:
We should not be aware of this link. To be honest I would like to know who brought it the first time on this forum and punch it on the nose (joking).
As far as it concern us, it's none of our business, but unfortunately we know about this and we decided to use it (myself included), even if we don't know exactly how it works. I see lots of assumptions. Also I am surprised since in this forum we said not to spread misleading info, and here we are spreading nonsense about something we don't know.
For example and I include myself in this:
Oh you are still in evaluation and everyone is in ranking:
Mate you are definitely under the 70% threshold and did not get it.
Might be, might not be, we don't know. In my case I prefer to be prepared for the worst. But we don't have any right to climb on a pedestal and say to other people you are below the threshold because I have some fragmented data.
Correct thing to say is:
Wait till the 11th and you will know for sure.
End of story
"round of applause"
Thanks guys
Bye
Indeed, success rate is about 12%. Most of the people in RANKING won't get it.MSCA_CHEM_2019 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:26 amI am agree with you!!! Some people (not all) commented about the evaluation like if they had already got the fellowship and they are only in Ranking.megasphaera wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:01 am
My two cents on this:
We should not be aware of this link. To be honest I would like to know who brought it the first time on this forum and punch it on the nose (joking).
As far as it concern us, it's none of our business, but unfortunately we know about this and we decided to use it (myself included), even if we don't know exactly how it works. I see lots of assumptions. Also I am surprised since in this forum we said not to spread misleading info, and here we are spreading nonsense about something we don't know.
For example and I include myself in this:
Oh you are still in evaluation and everyone is in ranking:
Mate you are definitely under the 70% threshold and did not get it.
Might be, might not be, we don't know. In my case I prefer to be prepared for the worst. But we don't have any right to climb on a pedestal and say to other people you are below the threshold because I have some fragmented data.
Correct thing to say is:
Wait till the 11th and you will know for sure.
End of story
"round of applause"
Thanks guys
Bye
I mean it does not matter who get it and who doesn't. Maybe in a parallel universe we all got it. Or maybe in an other one we are apes fighting for the control of the earth against humansIF ST LIF wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:32 amIndeed, success rate is about 12%. Most of the people in RANKING won't get it.MSCA_CHEM_2019 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:26 amI am agree with you!!! Some people (not all) commented about the evaluation like if they had already got the fellowship and they are only in Ranking.megasphaera wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 10:01 am
My two cents on this:
We should not be aware of this link. To be honest I would like to know who brought it the first time on this forum and punch it on the nose (joking).
As far as it concern us, it's none of our business, but unfortunately we know about this and we decided to use it (myself included), even if we don't know exactly how it works. I see lots of assumptions. Also I am surprised since in this forum we said not to spread misleading info, and here we are spreading nonsense about something we don't know.
For example and I include myself in this:
Oh you are still in evaluation and everyone is in ranking:
Mate you are definitely under the 70% threshold and did not get it.
Might be, might not be, we don't know. In my case I prefer to be prepared for the worst. But we don't have any right to climb on a pedestal and say to other people you are below the threshold because I have some fragmented data.
Correct thing to say is:
Wait till the 11th and you will know for sure.
End of story
"round of applause"
Thanks guys
Bye