It is a lottery. Your evaluation is entirely dependent upon the whims and feelings of whoever looks at your proposal.vectorhost wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:10 amGuys, is it SO difficult to get it if one is applying for the first time?
2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:04 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Thanks!Moose wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:13 amIt is a lottery. Your evaluation is entirely dependent upon the whims and feelings of whoever looks at your proposal.vectorhost wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:10 amGuys, is it SO difficult to get it if one is applying for the first time?
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 8:59 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I am really shocked of how people is able to get conclusions with 2 or 3 data. It can be certainly funny but of course it is far from being statistical significant to be taken seriously.
There are more than 11,500 proposals this year. The past year there was more than 9,000 proposals. With a few data about a "magical" link, disabling styles, etcetera some people is convinced that you got the grant if your are in evaluation , in ranking, or in Mars.....As an entertainment it sounds good, like the memes, or the funny mood of some people in this thread.
In my opinion, most people doesn't use the magical link or try to disable styles, so we will never know the real relationship between status (Evaluation, Ranking) and the final result.
Said that, good luck to all people both in Evaluation and in Ranking.
There are more than 11,500 proposals this year. The past year there was more than 9,000 proposals. With a few data about a "magical" link, disabling styles, etcetera some people is convinced that you got the grant if your are in evaluation , in ranking, or in Mars.....As an entertainment it sounds good, like the memes, or the funny mood of some people in this thread.
In my opinion, most people doesn't use the magical link or try to disable styles, so we will never know the real relationship between status (Evaluation, Ranking) and the final result.
Said that, good luck to all people both in Evaluation and in Ranking.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
This forum could provide some great fodder for qualitative research in group communication, but we definitely have no causal data on the relationship between these “clues” and the final results.IFCAR-2020 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:44 amI am really shocked of how people is able to get conclusions with 2 or 3 data. It can be certainly funny but of course it is far from being statistical significant to be taken seriously.
There are more than 11,500 proposals this year. The past year there was more than 9,000 proposals. With a few data about a "magical" link, disabling styles, etcetera some people is convinced that you got the grant if your are in evaluation , in ranking, or in Mars.....As an entertainment it sounds good, like the memes, or the funny mood of some people in this thread.
In my opinion, most people doesn't use the magical link or try to disable styles, so we will never know the real relationship between status (Evaluation, Ranking) and the final result.
Said that, good luck to all people both in Evaluation and in Ranking.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Haha, hilarious. Of course, it fooled me for a split second.MSCA_ENG20 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:30 amE-mails are coming!!!
...Sorry, please forgive the joke, I just couldn't resist...
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:58 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Not sure about clues for qual research though. Sounds like it all has already been well documented in psychiatric literature .
PetetheCat wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:01 amThis forum could provide some great fodder for qualitative research in group communication, but we definitely have no causal data on the relationship between these “clues” and the final results.IFCAR-2020 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:44 amI am really shocked of how people is able to get conclusions with 2 or 3 data. It can be certainly funny but of course it is far from being statistical significant to be taken seriously.
There are more than 11,500 proposals this year. The past year there was more than 9,000 proposals. With a few data about a "magical" link, disabling styles, etcetera some people is convinced that you got the grant if your are in evaluation , in ranking, or in Mars.....As an entertainment it sounds good, like the memes, or the funny mood of some people in this thread.
In my opinion, most people doesn't use the magical link or try to disable styles, so we will never know the real relationship between status (Evaluation, Ranking) and the final result.
Said that, good luck to all people both in Evaluation and in Ranking.
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Just a few more days!!!
Hard to understand that having the results ready, the EC made us to wait another crazy and alcoholic weekend... Dreamer, we love you and we need your NCP
Hard to understand that having the results ready, the EC made us to wait another crazy and alcoholic weekend... Dreamer, we love you and we need your NCP
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I think we might go without a leak this year
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Good morning everyone !
- Attachments
-
- stat.jpg (174.59 KiB) Viewed 4464 times