2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)

[Urbooo]

Has anyone heard of successful results coming through now, or only rejections?
Can Dreamer confirm the email strategy? Are winners notified first, and now only rejection?

The comms here is a complete disaster.

[112_MC]

...any winners after the first two rejections here? Maybe they are just sending emails randomly or according to the ID...isn't that possible?

There's an official announcement on Twitter... all the successful applicants were informed. Read between the lines what's the status of the rest of applicants. I've already cooped with rejection a few days back thanks to Dreamers.

I am probably too optimistic then . I initially thought thy just announced that results were out bit nothing more..

[MathGuy]

Has anyone heard of successful results coming through now, or only rejections?
Can Dreamer confirm the email strategy? Are winners notified first, and now only rejection?

The comms here is a complete disaster.

If you look back through the forum, there have been some rejections mixed in with winners

[Zeboim]

Has anyone heard of successful results coming through now, or only rejections?
Can Dreamer confirm the email strategy? Are winners notified first, and now only rejection?

The comms here is a complete disaster.

If you look back through the forum, there have been some rejections mixed in with winners

I guess they have changed their strategy this year.

[2_old_4_MSCA]

...any winners after the first two rejections here? Maybe they are just sending emails randomly or according to the ID...isn't that possible?

There's an official announcement on Twitter... all the successful applicants were informed. Read between the lines what's the status of the rest of applicants. I've already cooped with rejection a few days back thanks to Dreamers.

I am probably too optimistic then . I initially thought thy just announced that results were out bit nothing more..

I think your conclusion is not accurate. See below:

-----------------------------------------------
Here is the official twitter announcement from https://twitter.com/MSCActions :

Double exclamation mark #MSCA Individual Fellowships 2020 call results Double exclamation mark

€328 M in grants awarded to 1630 excellent experienced researchers from all over the world! Congratulations to recipients and thanks to all applicants!

More info on this call: https://europa.eu/!NR96dy

Due to the high volume of applicants to the call, the applicants are being informed gradually over the next day or two. The MSCA Social Media Team

-----------------------------------------------

[Zeboim]

There's an official announcement on Twitter... all the successful applicants were informed. Read between the lines what's the status of the rest of applicants. I've already cooped with rejection a few days back thanks to Dreamers.

I am probably too optimistic then . I initially thought thy just announced that results were out bit nothing more..

I think your conclusion is not accurate. See below:

-----------------------------------------------
Here is the official twitter announcement from https://twitter.com/MSCActions :

Double exclamation mark #MSCA Individual Fellowships 2020 call results Double exclamation mark

€328 M in grants awarded to 1630 excellent experienced researchers from all over the world! Congratulations to recipients and thanks to all applicants!

More info on this call: https://europa.eu/!NR96dy

Due to the high volume of applicants to the call, the applicants are being informed gradually over the next day or two. The MSCA Social Media Team

-----------------------------------------------

Dunno, you might be right. I understood the term 'gradually informed' in sense from the highest toward the lowest score. And the rejected started being informed.

[Ila-MSCA]

Hi everyone!
Here you find a poor in "Evaluation" lady of the LIF panel
I just would like to know if it is then confirmed that in Evaluation means < 70% (well, I was too self confident, then!) and if LIF results are out... little people from this panel in this group, if I do not get wrong...
Thank you!

[CountZ]

I received my evaluation report and I am on the reserve list. Someone else also shared theirs with me and they are on the reserve list with these scores:

Excellence 4.2
Impact 4.7
Implementation 4.8

However, the Impact and Implementation sections both say:

Weaknesses:
None

Is removing points but saying that a section has no weaknesses accepted by the European Commission? Would this be grounds for re-evaluation in your opinion or no?

[wait_for_w8...]

Hi everyone!
Here you find a poor in "Evaluation" lady of the LIF panel
I just would like to know if it is then confirmed that in Evaluation means < 70% (well, I was too self confident, then!) and if LIF results are out... little people from this panel in this group, if I do not get wrong...
Thank you!

Unfortunately, yes its below 70.

[wait_for_w8...]

I received my evaluation report and I am on the reserve list. Someone else also shared theirs with me and they are on the reserve list with these scores:

Excellence 4.2
Impact 4.7
Implementation 4.8

However, the Impact and Implementation sections both say:

Weaknesses:
None

Is removing points but saying that a section has no weaknesses accepted by the European Commission? Would this be grounds for re-evaluation in your opinion or no?

I guess they cut the scores in both sections simply because, someone can not get the grant ? Otherwise I dont understand how can NO weaknesses means drop in points.