2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)

[112_MC]

I have the same problem, and I will try.
A read that the request for reevaluation must be done by the grant coordinator of your host institution.
Best of lucks!

Got result- 90.4. Split 4.8/4.2/4.3. The comments do not make any sense.
Anyone tried `evaluation review` option? Reevaluation! , they seriously do that, does it work?

In my mind, the comments I have got do not make any sense....but I doubt they will re-evaluate the proposal...

[MSCA_ENG20]

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

[nino]

ok, here it goes:

"it is not clear in which sector (academy or industry) the applicant wants to develop his future career"

wtf.

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

[Biancaneve]

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

I'm in

One of my favorites: "The transfer of knowledge in the context of inter and multidisciplinarity does not seem to go beyond the existing expertise of the researcher" So, yeah, I know it all

[Little_Venice]

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

I'm in

One of my favorites: "The transfer of knowledge in the context of inter and multidisciplinarity does not seem to go beyond the existing expertise of the researcher" So, yeah, I know it all

[MSCA_ENG20]

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

I'm in

One of my favorites: "The transfer of knowledge in the context of inter and multidisciplinarity does not seem to go beyond the existing expertise of the researcher" So, yeah, I know it all

The applicant is too good. Two-way transfer is impossible.

[MSCA-IF-RI-LIF-2020]

ok, here it goes:

"it is not clear in which sector (academy or industry) the applicant wants to develop his future career"

wtf.

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

Did you have a previous position in industry? Otherwise that’s a wild comment!!

[MSCA-IF-RI-LIF-2020]

Guys, please don't give up now and let's continue discussing reviewer feedback in this 2020 thread instead of the 2021 thread!
We are so close to the absolute record from 2018!

I'm in

One of my favorites: "The transfer of knowledge in the context of inter and multidisciplinarity does not seem to go beyond the existing expertise of the researcher" So, yeah, I know it all

The applicant is too good. Two-way transfer is impossible.

I don’t know much for engineering but this always comes up for LIF, so hard to strike the balance that it’s close enough for them to be comfortable regarding feasibility, yet somehow different to promote the ever important transfer of knowledge. With all the fluff regarding public dissemination and the million other things we have to say we will do it’s amazing they think we will have time to do science to even facilitate the brain transplant.

[Wolvy_18]

Any info on the H2020-MSCA-IF-2020 cut-off statistics yet?

[streme]

Good morning guys and congratulations to the winners ! Do you know how i can start the appeal process? As you might understand i failed