Talk Academia

My results just came in. Not funded but SoE and exactly the score the Dream Team stated. Thanks for all the updates and commiserations everyone.

MatCham wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:56 am

My results just came in. Not funded but SoE and exactly the score the Dream Team stated. Thanks for all the updates and commiserations everyone.

is the Dream Team the same person as dreamer?

neurobabble wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:01 am

MatCham wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:56 am

My results just came in. Not funded but SoE and exactly the score the Dream Team stated. Thanks for all the updates and commiserations everyone.

is the Dream Team the same person as dreamer?

MatCham is referring to Dreamer and DreamerGirl collectively as the Dream Team.

mzach wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:15 am

neurobabble wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:06 am

Happyday wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:01 am

I see ranking! A bit strange

That's good (kinda), it at least means you weren't below 70%.

Come on ! It’s very hard to believe I got below 70% ! I have a really well written proposal addressing all points ! Maybe the idea is not ground breaking, but I cannot accept it that went below 70%

I see that is the case with many of us. second-time applicant addressed all the points by reviewers and scores fell below 70. can you imagine?

I've just received my rejection letter (86 %, CHE panel). It's very disappointing fact that reviewer/s didn't even get the point what my proposal is about.

Zeboim wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:22 am

I've just received my rejection letter (86 %, CHE panel). It's very disappointing fact that reviewer/s didn't even get the point what my proposal is about.

it's true, the reviewers often are only tangentially connected to our subfields, which puts them as far from our proposals as some colleague from a completely different discipline... congrats on the Seal of Excellence at least!

pepper wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:16 am

mzach wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:15 am

neurobabble wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:06 am

That's good (kinda), it at least means you weren't below 70%.

Come on ! It’s very hard to believe I got below 70% ! I have a really well written proposal addressing all points ! Maybe the idea is not ground breaking, but I cannot accept it that went below 70%

I see that is the case with many of us. second-time applicant addressed all the points by reviewers and scores fell below 70. can you imagine?

You made a good point, but I do not know why

LAVIN1234@1 wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:42 am

pepper wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:16 am

mzach wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 09, 2021 12:15 am

Come on ! It’s very hard to believe I got below 70% ! I have a really well written proposal addressing all points ! Maybe the idea is not ground breaking, but I cannot accept it that went below 70%

I see that is the case with many of us. second-time applicant addressed all the points by reviewers and scores fell below 70. can you imagine?

You made a good point, but I do not know why

I greatly improved my proposal

Is anyone able to confirm whether they are still sending out acceptances, or is it all rejections from here on out? I suspect the latter, but am very interested, and still infinitesimally hopeful, about the former...