aspil wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 8:35 pmOh..OK!Sleek_IF wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 5:49 pmI see..! I guess there were other factors the reviewers considered (not mentioned though). Otherwise, by addressing the weaknesses, one would have thought the score must have improved a lot (just 0.1 point) from the previous score. This competition is quite intensive..!
By the way, is your phase "ranking" now?
[/quote
I am still in 'evaluation'
2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Good point.
However, I do believe that most of the people in here are not first-timers. I had the feeling from previous years that the approval rate of participants in the forum are a bit higher than usual. There are lots of information here, and I think that although luck plays a huge role in this competition, being obsessive with the details of your proposal - which also means participating in online foruns about it - helps.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
You spelt out exactly what I was thinkingFu Manchu wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:20 pmGood point.
However, I do believe that most of the people in here are not first-timers. I had the feeling from previous years that the approval rate of participants in the forum are a bit higher than usual. There are lots of information here, and I think that although luck plays a huge role in this competition, being obsessive with the details of your proposal - which also means participating in online foruns about it - helps.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
And I did not mention that many extinct panels had around 40% of their applicants receiving the SoE (which means score>85).horizon wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:22 pmYou spelt out exactly what I was thinkingFu Manchu wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:20 pmGood point.
However, I do believe that most of the people in here are not first-timers. I had the feeling from previous years that the approval rate of participants in the forum are a bit higher than usual. There are lots of information here, and I think that although luck plays a huge role in this competition, being obsessive with the details of your proposal - which also means participating in online foruns about it - helps.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Guys,
I found a pdf document. Might help us to understand the evaluation process...
I still need to re-read it carefully, but from what I got so far, ranking, evluation are just steps into the process... they don`t mean score or anything...
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/fi ... uators.pdf
I found a pdf document. Might help us to understand the evaluation process...
I still need to re-read it carefully, but from what I got so far, ranking, evluation are just steps into the process... they don`t mean score or anything...
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/fi ... uators.pdf
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
In page 36 of this document, it says evaluators should proceed in alphabethical order of proposal`s acronyms.Cr@zyChem wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:02 pmGuys,
I found a pdf document. Might help us to understand the evaluation process...
I still need to re-read it carefully, but from what I got so far, ranking, evluation are just steps into the process... they don`t mean score or anything...evaluation phases.png
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/fi ... uators.pdf
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Evaluation process with experts already finished.. now just enter the scores to the systemCr@zyChem wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:07 pmIn page 36 of this document, it says evaluators should proceed in alphabethical order of proposal`s acronyms.Cr@zyChem wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:02 pmGuys,
I found a pdf document. Might help us to understand the evaluation process...
I still need to re-read it carefully, but from what I got so far, ranking, evluation are just steps into the process... they don`t mean score or anything...evaluation phases.png
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/fi ... uators.pdf