lol
2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Mine is also evaluation, 0%,
My host is UK. Maybe it is because of that if the host is EU country.
Or, the difference between evaluation and in ranking is ....... some hints that show in ranking are the successful applicant.
My host is UK. Maybe it is because of that if the host is EU country.
Or, the difference between evaluation and in ranking is ....... some hints that show in ranking are the successful applicant.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 12:52 pm
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Guys, again, ranking means score above 70%, I am sure.. Last year, only early rankers got funding. There is also possible to see the time when was the last funded ranking and the first ranking on the reserve list.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 12:52 pm
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
But I'm not saying that the situation will be the same this time. I have no idea.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
No it does not mean. >85 is ranking. Exceptional cases are there that below 85 went to ranking.
EF-LIF-2021 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:50 pmGuys, again, ranking means score above 70%, I am sure.. Last year, only early rankers got funding. There is also possible to see the time when was the last funded ranking and the first ranking on the reserve list.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
You are not checking by magic link. In the follow up all are the same.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
REPOSTING THE UPDATE for Magic Link:
NCP replied to my question regarding the phase on the magic link.
Note that the institution has a long history in MSCA (approx. 5 IF/PF per year).
The proposals that go through the Evaluation and the Quality Check (there are 3 like quality managers who need to approve the evaluation from the reviewers/evaluators, if not it is returned to them for amendments) are ready to be uploaded to the system. The uploads include huge chunks of proposals, and it may happen until the very end before the announcements. Ranking means that the proposal's score was above the threshold 70, and it was uploaded to the system, nothing more nothing less than that. This sorts out some mystery, but it remains that the evaluation may mean that either the proposal has not passed the threshold or that it has not been uploaded yet.
NCP replied to my question regarding the phase on the magic link.
Note that the institution has a long history in MSCA (approx. 5 IF/PF per year).
The proposals that go through the Evaluation and the Quality Check (there are 3 like quality managers who need to approve the evaluation from the reviewers/evaluators, if not it is returned to them for amendments) are ready to be uploaded to the system. The uploads include huge chunks of proposals, and it may happen until the very end before the announcements. Ranking means that the proposal's score was above the threshold 70, and it was uploaded to the system, nothing more nothing less than that. This sorts out some mystery, but it remains that the evaluation may mean that either the proposal has not passed the threshold or that it has not been uploaded yet.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2022 11:03 pm
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
I have been in evaluation since Friday noon, and my host is not UK, if that helps. And maybe it is wishful thinking, but I do not think Evaluation means anything besides "f*** we got interrupted during the evaluation process", at least this time... Doesn't matter, we'll only know for sure whence the results are out.
Edit: I (over)used the magic link to check status
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Yes... ranking doesn't mean you got above 85 but 70 or above... that's it....this is confirmed without doubts...UKR wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 9:00 pmNo it does not mean. >85 is ranking. Exceptional cases are there that below 85 went to ranking.EF-LIF-2021 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:50 pmGuys, again, ranking means score above 70%, I am sure.. Last year, only early rankers got funding. There is also possible to see the time when was the last funded ranking and the first ranking on the reserve list.
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:20 pm
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
I subscribe to this, although I'm not sure about the second part (early ranking = funded), but it might be the case. Like I said, I have served as evaluator for other calls and, before the cross-reading panel, proposals are already categorized as 'green' (above threshold) and 'red' (below threshold), based on the IERs. Red proposals are briefly discussed during the consensus panel meeting, but they may be moved to the green category if the cross-reader feels it was not evaluated fairly.EF-LIF-2021 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:50 pmGuys, again, ranking means score above 70%, I am sure.. Last year, only early rankers got funding. There is also possible to see the time when was the last funded ranking and the first ranking on the reserve list.
Also, I wanted to post this message, but I was refraining for some reason that only my contorted mind could explain (hence, forget it...).
I feel sorry for the delay. I am also CRAVING for the results and as an applicant myself I've questioned so many times 'WTF is the EC doing?!!'. But I also told you in one of my first posts that any kind of shit can happen, and this seems to be the case.
This to say that I feel I need to apologize, because I feel as if I were the bird of bad omen who had foreseen that the results would be late. While I have no responsibility in this, I am so truly sorry for having foreseen this delay. Sorry, call me Cassandra, use my username for you memes. At least you can laugh and that's my personal mission. Making people laugh, whatever the reason.
Sorry.