2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)

[pkourtes]

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

[Sleek_IF]

After a year of being in a queue, This January on 28th!

Aww! I just wonder how you felt for the whole one year expecting a positive response. Not easy....!

Yeah!!! Frustrating it was...
Usually, really few applicants in the reserve list get the grant...
Being listed in the first 10 in the reserve list can be something worth being optimistic about, otherwise, most probably you're not going to be invited out...

Oh...I see!

[2021]

28th January 2022 got finally rejected.

[UKR]

New research?

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

[Damanera]

The ERC results are published now so there’s nothing else in the pipeline for the EC except for our poor call

[iceman1991]

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

Weird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.

[Sleek_IF]

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

Weird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.

Ranking simply means a score of 70% and above (I think). Nothing more or less!

[UKR]

You want to conclude based on 30?

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

Weird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.

[little_m]

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

The first five numbers of proposal ID seems having pretty low variance, maybe first six numbers would be better (giving us approx. idea which thousand we are in, if it is starting from zero up).

[Maaaastricht]

Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.

Weird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.

Ranking simply means a score of 70% and above (I think). Nothing more or less!

Yeah only a threshold not funding.

Based on these early data it seems that certainly SOC panel above the threshold was divided alphabetically in two parts, first part (A through mid alphabet) ranked on 1 March and second on 2.