2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)

[Bahador]

Mocking us?

[XmendeleievX]

Mocking us?

Bro chill it must be from the previous year.

[UKR]

Grant Management Services will experience issues with the beneficiary data on Thursday, 17.03.2022, between 18:00 and 18:45, due to a Participant Register intervention.

[Bahador]

Mocking us?

Bro chill it must be from the previous year.

Strange though!

[AnotherCandidate]

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.

(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)

I'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...

New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)

[AnotherCandidate]

Maybe someone can share this google doc to the facebook group to have a better sampling

[Baka mitai]

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.

(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)

I'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...

New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)

Without the data on acceptance, it is but pure speculation.
That being said, I did not realize that some of you were in Rankings since March 1st, and having not left the Evaluation since at least the 11th, I am completely freaking out. Which, since I was desperate and angry earlier today, makes me wonder: what are the X phases of mourning supposed to be, again? And when comes the acceptance ??

[Maaaastricht]

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.

(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)

I'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...

New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)

Hmm… in SOC EF it looks pretty clear that A-O or A-P were ranked 1 March and the rest on 2 March.

[UKR]

We cant make any conclusion from few cases registered there.

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.

(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)

I'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...

New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)

Without the data on acceptance, it is but pure speculation.
That being said, I did not realize that some of you were in Rankings since March 1st, and having not left the Evaluation since at least the 11th, I am completely freaking out. Which, since I was desperate and angry earlier today, makes me wonder: what are the X phases of mourning supposed to be, again? And when comes the acceptance ??

[Fu Manchu]

Checking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.

(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)

I'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...

New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)

Hmm… in SOC EF it looks pretty clear that A-O or A-P were ranked 1 March and the rest on 2 March.

I was also ranked in 1 March - SOC-EF, P.

Not sure about the time. I checked around 19:00 - and I didnt check before it.