2022 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2022)

[CGN]

I was just checking the new google spreadsheet and I have a question:
Most of the stamp dates in the table are so early...Are you sure that you have written the date from the first page of the downloaded proposal? And NOT the submission date (from the last page)?

This date should be on the first page (upper right corner) and looks like this: Ref.Ares(2022)XXXXX - DD/MM/YYYY

Maybe I am wrong and the EC could worked up most of the proposals very early but I can hardly believe it...
I submitted a day before the deadline and my datestamp is 4 day later

I don't have any Ref.Ares(2022) in my downloaded proposal

EDIT: If I download it from the follow up menu, then I can see the Ref

[michelef]

I was just checking the new google spreadsheet and I have a question:
Most of the stamp dates in the table are so early...Are you sure that you have written the date from the first page of the downloaded proposal? And NOT the submission date (from the last page)?

This date should be on the first page (upper right corner) and looks like this: Ref.Ares(2022)XXXXX - DD/MM/YYYY

Maybe I am wrong and the EC could worked up most of the proposals very early but I can hardly believe it...
I submitted a day before the deadline and my datestamp is 4 day later

I don't have any Ref.Ares(2022) in my downloaded proposal

It depends on where you downloaded the proposal from. To see the stamp, you to go to *follow up*, select process documents, and download the proposal from there. If you instead downloaded it from *view submitted* then theres no time stamp there

[CGN]

I see that in the EF only 6334 proposals were submitted, but is there a way to know how many proposals were submitted to each panel?

To day I re-read my whole proposal and I found 3 errors (e.g., I forgot one verb, a parenthesis, etc.), do you think that this could be a major issue?

[marid00]

Out of curiosity, have any of you applied to go to the UK?

[Inmo23]

Hi! I am also still under evaluation. However, in the "follow up" you can see the progression of the evaluation if you put the arrow on the stages, I am still at 0%, does anyone have another percentage?

[michelef]

Hi! I am also still under evaluation. However, in the "follow up" you can see the progression of the evaluation if you put the arrow on the stages, I am still at 0%, does anyone have another percentage?

I think everyone have 0%... it does not mean anything

[Grace285]

Out of curiosity, have any of you applied to go to the UK?

yep!

[liukank]

I see that in the EF only 6334 proposals were submitted, but is there a way to know how many proposals were submitted to each panel?

To day I re-read my whole proposal and I found 3 errors (e.g., I forgot one verb, a parenthesis, etc.), do you think that this could be a major issue?

I've read successful applications with some minor typos like these As long as it is not changing the meaning of a sentence or making it hard to understand you shouldn't be worried.
I recently spotted a major error in my abstract, a word that completely changes the meaning of the sentence turning it senseless. I just wanted to die... The abstract was the only thing that has never been read by anyone else.

[CGN]

I see that in the EF only 6334 proposals were submitted, but is there a way to know how many proposals were submitted to each panel?

To day I re-read my whole proposal and I found 3 errors (e.g., I forgot one verb, a parenthesis, etc.), do you think that this could be a major issue?

I've read successful applications with some minor typos like these As long as it is not changing the meaning of a sentence or making it hard to understand you shouldn't be worried.
I recently spotted a major error in my abstract, a word that completely changes the meaning of the sentence turning it senseless. I just wanted to die... The abstract was the only thing that has never been read by anyone else.

I think that the abstract is not important, it's not part of the part B1 or B2. Don't worry

[assprovost]

Hello everyone! Good luck to you all with the applications in this round. Fingers crossed.

I wanted to ask when you get your evaluations, could you send me the comments that you received (+mentioning the discipline)? I want to analyze them vis-a-vis the evaluation criteria that EC posted. I promise to share the results that I uncover here and to all who sent me their comments.
NB: I will not identify acronyms or people names, but I might quote the comments verbatim to illustrate some points.

Anyways, no pressure, but I think it would be great to see if we could uncover any patterns.