Where did see your ranking?
Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:06 pm
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Dear sudhakar.gaikwad,
Each country has its so-called "national contact point." You can browse the national contact points by country here:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... upport/ncp
In my case, I have asked my institution's grant office to contact them for my reserve list ranking.
I hope this helps.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Few months for redress? The portal say they will try to address it within 30 days.liukank wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:59 pmI asked for a redress last year. The process takes a few months and you get an answer before the deadline, so you could do both. However, is mainly useless as they dismiss your claims on the base that the process is fair and blablabla. I knew it would turn to nothing, only applied for a re-evaluation because I was very frustrated and felt that I needed to put out all this frustration, Do this if you think you have a very good claim, but keep in mind that most probably it will be for nothing.rosebud_90 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 12:09 pmHi everyone, I'm on the reserve list with a score of 90.6% (4.3/4.8/4.7), GF-SOC.
Apparently I am ranked 19th on the SOC panel, apprently the cut-off this year for GF-SOC was 93.6% (see here in section "call updates": https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... ePageState).
Does anyone have any info about the "Redress" (re-evaluation request) process?
What gives a higher chance of success, Redress or Re-submission?
Thanks!
By the way, I'm in reserve list for GF-SOC too but I am not really counting on it.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
I don't think so. You have 30 days to file a claim for redress, but they will then take a couple of months or maybe more to answer. I don't remember exactly but it is definitely not 30 days.PHSeal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 8:57 pmFew months for redress? The portal say they will try to address it within 30 days.liukank wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:59 pmI asked for a redress last year. The process takes a few months and you get an answer before the deadline, so you could do both. However, is mainly useless as they dismiss your claims on the base that the process is fair and blablabla. I knew it would turn to nothing, only applied for a re-evaluation because I was very frustrated and felt that I needed to put out all this frustration, Do this if you think you have a very good claim, but keep in mind that most probably it will be for nothing.rosebud_90 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 12:09 pmHi everyone, I'm on the reserve list with a score of 90.6% (4.3/4.8/4.7), GF-SOC.
Apparently I am ranked 19th on the SOC panel, apprently the cut-off this year for GF-SOC was 93.6% (see here in section "call updates": https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... ePageState).
Does anyone have any info about the "Redress" (re-evaluation request) process?
What gives a higher chance of success, Redress or Re-submission?
Thanks!
By the way, I'm in reserve list for GF-SOC too but I am not really counting on it.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
From where you got the information that you are on the reserve list at number 1.
tq
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Thankscda wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:51 pmDear sudhakar.gaikwad,
Each country has its so-called "national contact point." You can browse the national contact points by country here:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... upport/ncp
In my case, I have asked my institution's grant office to contact them for my reserve list ranking.
I hope this helps.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
cda wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:32 pmDear Yanmiao,Yanmiao wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:14 pmNow see how it work.. the cut-off for GF-CHE is 95 % and yours 92.8 % and reserve list at no: 1, what about the 94.4, 94.2 etc. and the result cut -off declared it shows that 94, 93 and 92 there are significant participants. very confusing. what about those participants
Thank you! GF-CHE is so competitive this year (95%!!!). I did a calculation on GF-CHE based on the table: proposal number equal or above 95% is around 9, proposal between 93%-94% is 0, proposal equal or above 92% is around 12, so there are 3 person have scores between 92% to 93%. Mine (92%) probably the 3rd of GF-CHE on reserve list.
I think you are correct! You can still be second if the other person got your same score.
Does anyone know how many projects are usually funded from the reserve list?
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Now see how it work.. the cut-off for GF-CHE is 95 % and yours 92.8 % and reserve list at no: 1, what about the 94.4, 94.2 etc. and the result cut -off declared it shows that 94, 93 and 92 there are significant participants. very confusing. what about those participantsSyd87 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 4:07 amThankscda wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2023 7:51 pmDear sudhakar.gaikwad,
Each country has its so-called "national contact point." You can browse the national contact points by country here:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... upport/ncp
In my case, I have asked my institution's grant office to contact them for my reserve list ranking.
I hope this helps.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Hi! does anyone know if we can download the SoE certificate? or if we have to wait until the reserve list situation is solved?
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:00 pm