2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)

[ATBGF2017]

Another comment: The proposal does not provide sufficient detail on the amount of person months calculated in relation to the proposed work.

I did show these in a separate table month by month. I cannot believe the unprofessionalism. Does not the EC have some standard about who can be a reviewer?

Rjected.

This fucking thing is a huge hoax. Look at the comments below:

The proposal does not make sufficiently clear the number of article/papers to submit. (I did, I even gave the number of articles!)
• The proposal overlaps between communication and dissemination activities. The communication measures are not sufficiently detailed and
not adequately addressed in the Gantt chart (I did address them in the text. There is no need to do it in the Gantt Chart).

I did not see your proposal, but the communication and number of papers comments were made by total idiots or people that just wanted to screw your proposal because they didnt like it.

BTW, which panel (SOC, ENV, etc) and when did you go to Ranking?

Good luck, as you can see it´s a lottery

[ATBGF2017]

Mine was GF-SOC and I was ranking since January 12.

[Imbingo]

Another comment: The proposal does not provide sufficient detail on the amount of person months calculated in relation to the proposed work.

I did show these in a separate table month by month. I cannot believe the unprofessionalism. Does not the EC have some standard about who can be a reviewer?

Rjected.

This fucking thing is a huge hoax. Look at the comments below:

The proposal does not make sufficiently clear the number of article/papers to submit. (I did, I even gave the number of articles!)
• The proposal overlaps between communication and dissemination activities. The communication measures are not sufficiently detailed and
not adequately addressed in the Gantt chart (I did address them in the text. There is no need to do it in the Gantt Chart).

I did not see your proposal, but the communication and number of papers comments were made by total idiots or people that just wanted to screw your proposal because they didnt like it.

BTW, which panel (SOC, ENV, etc) and when did you go to Ranking?

Good luck, as you can see it´s a lottery

Omg.... I feel your pain

[Rapaz]

Mine was GF-SOC and I was ranking since January 12.

I already noticed that with my last proposal (submitted two times) - if they dont like it, they will find any possibile way to screw it, under any excuse, like the idiot-ness with the number of papers.
This yeat I´ve started from zero- we´ll see

Good luck and good night

[Amar]

Another comment: The proposal does not provide sufficient detail on the amount of person months calculated in relation to the proposed work.

I did show these in a separate table month by month. I cannot believe the unprofessionalism. Does not the EC have some standard about who can be a reviewer?

Rjected.

This fucking thing is a huge hoax. Look at the comments below:

The proposal does not make sufficiently clear the number of article/papers to submit. (I did, I even gave the number of articles!)
• The proposal overlaps between communication and dissemination activities. The communication measures are not sufficiently detailed and
not adequately addressed in the Gantt chart (I did address them in the text. There is no need to do it in the Gantt Chart).

I did not see your proposal, but the communication and number of papers comments were made by total idiots or people that just wanted to screw your proposal because they didnt like it.

BTW, which panel (SOC, ENV, etc) and when did you go to Ranking?

Good luck, as you can see it´s a lottery

Wow, who are those people (reviewers)????

[AlexMC2017]

Hey,

Anybody from those who already know their final results, could you tell us if besides the email you can see a notification on the participant portal?

So anxious!!

[als]

Hi all,

I was rejected (IF-Life Sciences) - I was in reserve last year (92%) and this year I got an 88.4%... unbelievable!

Good luck to the rest!!!

[Rapaz]

Hi all,

I was rejected (IF-Life Sciences) - I was in reserve last year (92%) and this year I got an 88.4%... unbelievable!

Good luck to the rest!!!

Again - a TOTAL LOTTERY. I´m sorry and really frustrated to read it! Don´t they notice that if you resubmit the proposal , it is probably IMPROVED? So if the score is lower, probably the evaluation system is bad...

When did you go to Ranking?

[ouriell]

got it!!!! 95.20% LIF

[Rapaz]

got it!!!! 95.20% LIF

CONGRATS!!!!!! GF or EF?

When did you go to Ranking?

How did you first check it? By FO button, email or notifications?