2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)

[cosmonaute]

a much worse score this time than last time (80%, 2nd time, ID 789xxx, email received at 6:17 a.m.), and the comments are seriously off-point, as if given by people who didn't really read the proposal ..

is there a way to appeal/ask for an extra evaluation?

[InfoCom]

Second rejection this year. GF-SOC 83%. Reviews were of much higher quality this year, and written in such a way that it is clear how to address them - last year I got a couple of general comments like "insufficient detail"/"insufficient information" that are not helpful for improving a proposal. However I am sure the reviewers will find new weaknesses next year. I am still very disappointed but nothing can be changed now!

In my case review quality is very bad. I can't imagine how some one can give such non serious comments. I am ok I had alternative options but there are people who really need this and reviewer show such non serious attitude.

Everybody gets some review comments of questionable quality (myself included). This is how MSCA works... If you intend to re-apply you should keep this in mind (to not get frustrated )!!!

In my publication plan, I had the top venues (both conferences and journals) of my domain and I got this comment: "the respective venues are of medium quality". At best, this reviewer is not very familiar with the domain so I wonder why he/she reviewed my proposal.
Not complaining, I knew that it is always possible to get such comments with MSCA...

I don't think so I will apply again. And similar kind of comments in my report as well. I suggested the journals all with above 96% JIF score but according to reviewer its not good enough lol.

[dsmg]

Got it! PHY panel. It was my 3rd time. However, I am unable to open the MP button...

Congratulations. ID please

[sci'stache]

I got it. CHE, 3rd time. I got 88 first time and 80 second time.
ID 797xxx, informed 10:21
changed to ranking on 24th

[all_Al]

ahhh no news yet!!
EVALUATION
PHY
no links working

[Chem-IF]

I am unable to open MP (Manage project tab) any suggestions?

it is slow also for me but opening after few attempts

How do we know we are not in reserve list?

I got an email which clearly said that we can start grant preparation. Also there is the letter in the Project section of PP which is specifically for 'invitation to gant preparation'.
Considering that I got 95.2% and you more than 98%, I will be really surprised if you are in the reserved list.
so don't worry at all.

[Chem-IF]

it is slow also for me but opening after few attempts

How do we know we are not in reserve list?

I got an email which clearly said that we can start grant preparation. Also there is the letter in the Project section of PP which is specifically for 'invitation to gant preparation'.
Considering that I got 95.2% and you more than 98%, I will be really surprised if you are in the reserved list.
so don't worry at all.

sorry I was confused about score, I guess you don't have score yet.
But still it seems you got it.

[FuriousAcademic]

is there a way to appeal/ask for an extra evaluation?

There is, but it is time-consuming and useless - they never change anything.

[all_Al]

anyone with GF news yet???

[Akshath]

How do we know we are not in reserve list?

I got an email which clearly said that we can start grant preparation. Also there is the letter in the Project section of PP which is specifically for 'invitation to gant preparation'.
Considering that I got 95.2% and you more than 98%, I will be really surprised if you are in the reserved list.
so don't worry at all.

sorry I was confused about score, I guess you don't have score yet.
But still it seems you got it.

Hi I got notification for starting grant agreement and some Honour agreements