can not access the server....so I do not know the score. I will update once I can access it.
2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
796XXXX
Rejected (IF)
Total Score 85%
Three sections scores (4.2-4.2-4.5)
Got the email today morning
Chemistry.
What is the granted score in the chemistry this year?
Rejected (IF)
Total Score 85%
Three sections scores (4.2-4.2-4.5)
Got the email today morning
Chemistry.
What is the granted score in the chemistry this year?
Last edited by Soliman on Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:23 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
Academics_Anonymous
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:40 pm
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Got rejected as I guessed this morning.
"Ranking" since 12th of January. Project ID 800xxx, received the e-mail 10 mins. ago.
Cannot see the score yet.
edit: In the reserve list
"Ranking" since 12th of January. Project ID 800xxx, received the e-mail 10 mins. ago.
Cannot see the score yet.
edit: In the reserve list
Last edited by Academics_Anonymous on Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Sorry guys, how do you check your score?
))Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Some comments from my end...after getting this fellowship with 88.6% - it is my first ever fellowship I apply to.
1. The evaluation reviewer comments are not so useful...very generic things for weaknesses. Nothing related to science or my/supervisors/host CV. I was critisised for not specifying the journal I wanted to publish. I did specify though....the exact number of papers and the target journals. So felt a bit that they were evaluating another report? Or they could not be bothered....we will never find out.
2. You should try to apply with a panel other than ST. It is very competitive. I feel really bad because a lot of people here had scores much bigger than mine yet they did not get it due to panel. If you want a MSCA IF, perhaps try to find a host outside academia. For example, a research hospital, an R&D department of a company etc...
I am so sorry for all folk who got bad news today...it was a real pain to write these 10 pages
1. The evaluation reviewer comments are not so useful...very generic things for weaknesses. Nothing related to science or my/supervisors/host CV. I was critisised for not specifying the journal I wanted to publish. I did specify though....the exact number of papers and the target journals. So felt a bit that they were evaluating another report? Or they could not be bothered....we will never find out.
2. You should try to apply with a panel other than ST. It is very competitive. I feel really bad because a lot of people here had scores much bigger than mine yet they did not get it due to panel. If you want a MSCA IF, perhaps try to find a host outside academia. For example, a research hospital, an R&D department of a company etc...
I am so sorry for all folk who got bad news today...it was a real pain to write these 10 pages
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
sci'stache wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:28 amI got it. CHE, 3rd time. I got 88 first time and 80 second time.
ID 797xxx, informed 10:21
changed to ranking on 24th
796XXXX
Rejected (ST- IF)
Total Score 85% (first time)
Three sections scores (4.2-4.2-4.5)
Got the email today morning
Chemistry.
What is the granted score in the chemistry this year?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Thanks.
As I can´t see the score (servers collapsed), It´s so hard to believe. But the Proposal is already in Projects section and the emails are clear.
Now, does anyone know if the Grant Agreement is very complicated and time consuming?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Reserve list here, 92.6 ST LIF. What a pain... so close I guess!
-
pinedamarcelo
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:19 pm