Very sorry to hear, mate. I hope you do better in the other applications.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Really sorry yo hear that.. Although,i am into ranking but loosing hope to hear your result.
PetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I am really sorry to hear this. It is my first application and still I am so nervous about the results.. I am guessing that it would be even harder for someone that has applied twice .. I am really anxious also hearing about the subjectivity of the reviewing process . Does not make any sense.
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I do agree with you and sorry for you. It is so painfulPetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
Last edited by NoPanic42 on Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Indeed. Perhaps a good strategy is to change things in case of failure. Institution and supervisor. So it wont be a resub.Steminist wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:13 pmHei Pete, I am also sorry to hear that. I think your experience will guide a lot to people in here, including me. After you and Dreamer, I think I will not consider a resubmission.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
Thank you so much for your time and sharings with us during last months, it was a pleasure!
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 12:28 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Oh crap, our two veterans/heroes dropped below threshold, what a complete non-sense...PetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
I'm so sorry for you...
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
The irony being that I had good reasons fir the host institution and supervisor that should have been compelling for the nature of the MSCA and my integration plans . . .Fu Manchu wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:16 pmIndeed. Perhaps a good strategy is to change things in case of failure. Institution and supervisor. So it wont be a resub.Steminist wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:13 pmHei Pete, I am also sorry to hear that. I think your experience will guide a lot to people in here, including me. After you and Dreamer, I think I will not consider a resubmission.PetetheCat wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:08 pmUgh, via a leak also dropped below threshold. Submission #1 = seal of excellence & waitlist etc, submission #2, rejection, but strong scores on everything but excellence and still over 80, submission #3 below threshold and I’m sure it is because I addressed the reviewer critique from last year.
My advice, if you resubmit, don’t do much and just resubmit the same.
I was in evaluation still, so I think ranking/evaluation holds true.
The reviewer process is a genuine lottery. I’m sad about the emotional energy I wasted.
Thank you so much for your time and sharings with us during last months, it was a pleasure!