2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Has anyone heard of successful results coming through now, or only rejections?
Can Dreamer confirm the email strategy? Are winners notified first, and now only rejection?
The comms here is a complete disaster.
Can Dreamer confirm the email strategy? Are winners notified first, and now only rejection?
The comms here is a complete disaster.
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I am probably too optimistic then . I initially thought thy just announced that results were out bit nothing more..
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
If you look back through the forum, there have been some rejections mixed in with winners
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:23 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I think your conclusion is not accurate. See below:112_MC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:22 pmI am probably too optimistic then . I initially thought thy just announced that results were out bit nothing more..
-----------------------------------------------
Here is the official twitter announcement from https://twitter.com/MSCActions :
Double exclamation mark #MSCA Individual Fellowships 2020 call results Double exclamation mark
€328 M in grants awarded to 1630 excellent experienced researchers from all over the world! Congratulations to recipients and thanks to all applicants!
More info on this call: https://europa.eu/!NR96dy
Due to the high volume of applicants to the call, the applicants are being informed gradually over the next day or two. The MSCA Social Media Team
-----------------------------------------------
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Dunno, you might be right. I understood the term 'gradually informed' in sense from the highest toward the lowest score. And the rejected started being informed.2_old_4_MSCA wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:28 pmI think your conclusion is not accurate. See below:
-----------------------------------------------
Here is the official twitter announcement from https://twitter.com/MSCActions :
Double exclamation mark #MSCA Individual Fellowships 2020 call results Double exclamation mark
€328 M in grants awarded to 1630 excellent experienced researchers from all over the world! Congratulations to recipients and thanks to all applicants!
More info on this call: https://europa.eu/!NR96dy
Due to the high volume of applicants to the call, the applicants are being informed gradually over the next day or two. The MSCA Social Media Team
-----------------------------------------------
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Hi everyone!
Here you find a poor in "Evaluation" lady of the LIF panel
I just would like to know if it is then confirmed that in Evaluation means < 70% (well, I was too self confident, then!) and if LIF results are out... little people from this panel in this group, if I do not get wrong...
Thank you!
Here you find a poor in "Evaluation" lady of the LIF panel
I just would like to know if it is then confirmed that in Evaluation means < 70% (well, I was too self confident, then!) and if LIF results are out... little people from this panel in this group, if I do not get wrong...
Thank you!
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I received my evaluation report and I am on the reserve list. Someone else also shared theirs with me and they are on the reserve list with these scores:
However, the Impact and Implementation sections both say:Excellence 4.2
Impact 4.7
Implementation 4.8
Is removing points but saying that a section has no weaknesses accepted by the European Commission? Would this be grounds for re-evaluation in your opinion or no?Weaknesses:
None
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:44 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Unfortunately, yes its below 70.Ila-MSCA wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:36 pmHi everyone!
Here you find a poor in "Evaluation" lady of the LIF panel
I just would like to know if it is then confirmed that in Evaluation means < 70% (well, I was too self confident, then!) and if LIF results are out... little people from this panel in this group, if I do not get wrong...
Thank you!
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:44 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I guess they cut the scores in both sections simply because, someone can not get the grant ? Otherwise I dont understand how can NO weaknesses means drop in points.CountZ wrote: ↑Mon Feb 08, 2021 3:39 pmI received my evaluation report and I am on the reserve list. Someone else also shared theirs with me and they are on the reserve list with these scores:
However, the Impact and Implementation sections both say:Excellence 4.2
Impact 4.7
Implementation 4.8Is removing points but saying that a section has no weaknesses accepted by the European Commission? Would this be grounds for re-evaluation in your opinion or no?Weaknesses:
None