2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Hey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Oh...I see!
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
28th January 2022 got finally rejected.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
New research?
pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
The ERC results are published now so there’s nothing else in the pipeline for the EC except for our poor call
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:37 pm
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Weird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Ranking simply means a score of 70% and above (I think). Nothing more or less!iceman1991 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:43 pmWeird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
You want to conclude based on 30?
iceman1991 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:43 pmWeird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
The first five numbers of proposal ID seems having pretty low variance, maybe first six numbers would be better (giving us approx. idea which thousand we are in, if it is starting from zero up).pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 9:50 am
Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Yeah only a threshold not funding.Sleek_IF wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:50 pmRanking simply means a score of 70% and above (I think). Nothing more or less!iceman1991 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:43 pmWeird how most people are ranking despite the fact that the hypothesis is the sooner the ranking, the higher the score, and almost all on March 1 or 2. You would expect more people to be evaluation, since more people are rejected than accepted. Unless theres a lot more response bias from the 'Ranking' people.pkourtes wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 11:54 amHey Guys,
We need also people with an Evaluation in their phase to put their data in the Excel:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For Magic Link, having both Evaluation and Ranking (and why not Submission) may assist to form a dissociation between them, and come up with better inferences/speculations.
Based on these early data it seems that certainly SOC panel above the threshold was divided alphabetically in two parts, first part (A through mid alphabet) ranked on 1 March and second on 2.