This is absolutely ridiculous. Highly frustrating and de-motivating others to think twice whether to apply again or not.Fu Manchu wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:42 amSame proposal:
2020 - Strengths:
1- The proposal includes a risk assessment which also addresses potential Covid-19 restriction and provides alternative approaches.
2- The proposal contains a clear, detailed and feasible outline of proposed dissemination measures and potential impact is realistic.
2- The project identifies a strategy to target key academic peers and non-academic stakeholders.
3- The research and training activities would contribute to the researcher's overall goal and aspiration towards an academic career and a future professorship.
2021 - Weaknesses:
1- The risk assessment plan is not sufficiently clear on specific mitigation measures and/or contingency plan(s).
2- The planned dissemination and exploitation measures within the academia are not explained with sufficient detail.
3- The expected future career perspectives and employability of the researcher after the fellowship are not adequately addressed.
Well... I had only 5 comments as weaknesses. At least two and a half of them were seeing as "strengths" in 2020's call. This isn't right.
hmmm... something should be DONE and make the concerned European authorities be aware of such uncertainties in such a prestigious research funding call assessment.