Amar, did you get results?Amar wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:38 pm79 and what digit after it?blablaMSCA wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:35 pmemail came at 2:59 am (GMT), IF-ST ENV panel proposal ID 79XXXX
2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I am among the rejected!
It is frustrating and demotivating to see that your application has been evaluated by people who are totally incompetent for your subject, and who have decided to reject even though they can not deny the quality of the project.
For those working in Humanities these opportunities of funding are very rare, and greater impartiality and competence should be guaranteed.
It is frustrating and demotivating to see that your application has been evaluated by people who are totally incompetent for your subject, and who have decided to reject even though they can not deny the quality of the project.
For those working in Humanities these opportunities of funding are very rare, and greater impartiality and competence should be guaranteed.
rsr wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:21 amEverybody gets some review comments of questionable quality (myself included). This is how MSCA works... If you intend to re-apply you should keep this in mind (to not get frustrated )!!!InfoCom wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:16 amIn my case review quality is very bad. I can't imagine how some one can give such non serious comments. I am ok I had alternative options but there are people who really need this and reviewer show such non serious attitude.ANGF wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:38 amSecond rejection this year. GF-SOC 83%. Reviews were of much higher quality this year, and written in such a way that it is clear how to address them - last year I got a couple of general comments like "insufficient detail"/"insufficient information" that are not helpful for improving a proposal. However I am sure the reviewers will find new weaknesses next year. I am still very disappointed but nothing can be changed now!
In my publication plan, I had the top venues (both conferences and journals) of my domain and I got this comment: "the respective venues are of medium quality". At best, this reviewer is not very familiar with the domain so I wonder why he/she reviewed my proposal.
Not complaining, I knew that it is always possible to get such comments with MSCA...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
as a statistic, ID 7948** and I received the email around 5:30 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
10:35 A.M. UK time
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
799***
... and still nothing
..maybe under threshold.....
... and still nothing
..maybe under threshold.....