Where did you find it?MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:44 amThey just uploaded an 'ethics report" in my documents, saying the proposal is "ethics ready"!! Did nit receive an ethics report last year
Id: 845
2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Document library
Vency wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:45 amWhere did you find it?MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:44 amThey just uploaded an 'ethics report" in my documents, saying the proposal is "ethics ready"!! Did nit receive an ethics report last year
Id: 845
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Persons month. Its the second time ive seen it being critisized but i still dont know what the heck this is!
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:42 amAgree with you. As an example, last year gantt chart was amazing, very organized and clear. This year, it was the same, with the only addition of persons-months and they said that it is a mess and not clear. WTF!Dajm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:35 amIn my case, most of what's listed as "weaknesses" are actually questions that could have been easily answered. Like, how well do you speak the languages of the case countries? - Fluently, please refer to the resume. Or, Have you considered gender aspects? - Yes, I have but my focus is on social meanings shares by both genders. Etc, etc. What's frustrating is that even though the projects is relatively highly scored, the reviews look sloppy. This year's reviews contradict last year's and it is clear that even though specifically asked to consider previous feedback this year's reviewers did not bother to reconcile the differences in opinion. There is also a factually erroneous comment which states that the time frame of the analysis is not mentioned (it is).
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:51 am
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Oh wow, I got funded! 844xxx here, got the email at 9:06 am. 97.4% in CHE panel.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Congrats,
Do you have an "Ethics Appraisal Report" uploaded today as well ?
Do you have an "Ethics Appraisal Report" uploaded today as well ?
CatalysaurusRex wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:46 amOh wow, I got funded! 844xxx here, got the email at 9:06 am. 97.4% in CHE panel.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
So we’re at about 845xxx?
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:45 amDocument libraryVency wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:45 amWhere did you find it?MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:44 amThey just uploaded an 'ethics report" in my documents, saying the proposal is "ethics ready"!! Did nit receive an ethics report last year
Id: 845
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2019 3:48 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Just found out
CAR-LIF panel. Rejected with 79.4. I am in free fall, it seems.
In 2016 I got 90.2 with 3 weeks of work. 2017: 84 with 2 months of work. And then this year (2 months of work as well).
Same project and this year's proposal was the best articulated so far, in my opinion and also the supervisor's
Well, I knew this is a lottery and I am stomach-breathing to calm down.
For the successful ones: cheers guys
CAR-LIF panel. Rejected with 79.4. I am in free fall, it seems.
In 2016 I got 90.2 with 3 weeks of work. 2017: 84 with 2 months of work. And then this year (2 months of work as well).
Same project and this year's proposal was the best articulated so far, in my opinion and also the supervisor's
Well, I knew this is a lottery and I am stomach-breathing to calm down.
For the successful ones: cheers guys
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:51 am
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Yes, that's in the portal available for download.
MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:47 amCongrats,
Do you have an "Ethics Appraisal Report" uploaded today as well ?CatalysaurusRex wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:46 amOh wow, I got funded! 844xxx here, got the email at 9:06 am. 97.4% in CHE panel.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Same here. Last year - Gantt chart very clear and well-organized. This year added more fieldwork (totally unnecessary but adamantly requested by last year's reviews) so broke it down a bit further (from uni terms to calendar months, rest stayed the same) and it suddenly stopped making any sense to the reviewers . Last year I disagreed with some of the reviewer comments but at least I could see where they were coming from. This year it's literally like: how can one possibly be listing as "weaknesses" the obvious strengths of the project? .
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:42 amAgree with you. As an example, last year gantt chart was amazing, very organized and clear. This year, it was the same, with the only addition of persons-months and they said that it is a mess and not clear. WTF!Dajm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:35 amIn my case, most of what's listed as "weaknesses" are actually questions that could have been easily answered. Like, how well do you speak the languages of the case countries? - Fluently, please refer to the resume. Or, Have you considered gender aspects? - Yes, I have but my focus is on social meanings shares by both genders. Etc, etc. What's frustrating is that even though the projects is relatively highly scored, the reviews look sloppy. This year's reviews contradict last year's and it is clear that even though specifically asked to consider previous feedback this year's reviewers did not bother to reconcile the differences in opinion. There is also a factually erroneous comment which states that the time frame of the analysis is not mentioned (it is).